Which factor is NOT considered when determining a guardian's fees under NGA standards?

When determining a guardian's fees under the National Guardianship Association (NGA) standards, the focus is primarily on aspects that contribute to the actual work performed in the role of a guardian. Factors such as time spent, the skill intensity of the work, and the estimated value of the services provided are all critically relevant and directly reflective of the responsibilities undertaken.

On the other hand, the reputation of the guardian, while important for many professional contexts, does not factor into the computation of fees according to NGA standards. This is because fees aim to be commensurate with the effort, expertise, and complexity involved in the guardian's tasks rather than influenced by the guardian's standing or image in the community. The emphasis is on the tangible aspects of the guardian's work rather than on subjective judgments of reputation, which can vary widely and may not correspond to the quality or quantity of service rendered. Thus, it is the objective elements that qualify for fee determination, making the reputation of the guardian irrelevant in this specific context.